a-vrite III, 42, 3. ati-vidhe V, 62, 9. gubhé 1, 64, 4. 87, 3. 117, 5. 119, 3. 127, 6. 167, 6. III. 26, 4. a-säde. 13, 7. 1II, 41, 9. V. 26, 8. 46, 5. VIII, 49, 1. 54, 6. 1X, 98. 10. X. 188, 1. ni⸗ shäde(Vad) 1, 104, 1. sam-shüde VIII, 17, 6. ati-shkäde VIII, 56, 19. prati-shkäbhe (Vskabh) I, 39, 2. vi-shkäbhe VIII, 89, 12. ni-sprige(vysparg). pari-shväje X, 40, 10. sam-idhe l, 113, 9. para-dai(Vd a) VII, 19, 7. pra-khyai(Vkhya) VII, 81, 4. vikhyai X, 158, 4. à-yai(Vy a), II, 18, 3. pra-yai l, 142, 6. X, 104, 3.(Roth. coni. pra-pai) ava-yai, upa-yai VIII, 47, 12.

Cum his infinitivis aptissime comparare possumus bactricoss), quos eadem ratione formatos esse apparet, ut igçe(Vi c), naàshe yt. 24, 29; anashe y. 43, 14. viduye(vid) y. 43, 3 vaçemi viduye, volo scire y. 29, 3. 31, 5, vividuyeée y. 42, 9. zaozizuye(Vzu) y. 27, 6. duye(du= da) y. 45, 15. fràät-buye, vit-buye(Vbu) yt. 15, 52. mereñgeduye(Vmareñc duyèe) y. 52, 6. çùyè(cu) y. 48. 9. cf. Schleicheri comp. p. 376. Pergimus ad eas vedicas formas, quae ad aoristum haud dubie revocandae sunt, quales sunt: jishé(Vji) I, 112, 12 yäbhi rätham ävatam jishé, quibus(auxiliis) currum iuvistis, ut vinceret, cf. I, 111, 4. vakshé(jrah) stushé(stu), méshe(ymi) v. Pan. III. 4, 9. Bopp. III, p. 270. jeshé, quod Benfey. gr. sanscr. mai.§. 919. V. infinitivum radicis ji esse existimat, Rothius in lex. Petrop. s. v. jeshä locativum substantivi jeshä esse contendit. cf. RV. I, 100, 1 1. Hos infinitivos plane congruere cum Graecorum infinitivis aoristi primi qui dicitur facile intellegetur, si com- paraverimus 45G ₰ά, w‿σ, εεα᷑-Gα, quamquam, utrum in dativis an in locativis habendi sint, dubitari potest. Ac Schleicherus quidem eos ad locativos thematum in a desinentium(A0Gα.) refert p. 377, Boppius dativos esse censet, cuius sententia magis mihi probatur quam illius. Aoristi enim thema, quod est 1uO-, in dativo esse positum existimo. Sed utcunque res sese habet, hoc certe constare mihi vide- tur, inesse in eis infinitivis residuum radicis as, esse. Neque vero hoc loco omittendum est in scholiis ad Pan. III, 4, 10 duos legi infinitivos, rohishyai et avyathishy ai, qui ad futurum secundum potius quam ad aoristum tertiae formationis, ut Boppius censet p. 269, pertinere videntur.

Jam venio ad substantiva in as finita, quorum dativus in ase vel äse infinitivi partes agit: ävase I. 34, 12 vàm ävase johavimi, vos auxilio vocito. cf. I, 17, 2. 22, 6, 10. 34, 12. 35, 1. 45, 5. 47, 10. 48, 14. 52, 1, 12. 89, 5, 7. 100, 8. 102, 10. 112, 24. 114, 4. 118, 10. 127, 4. 128, 8. 129, 10. 135, 3. 164. 52. 168, 1. 183, 5. 186, 10. II, 16, 1. 29, 1. 34, 14. III, 13, 2. 26, 2. 47, 5. 54, 12. 57, 5. 62, 2. IV, 2, 13. 3, 1. 20, I. 21. 1, 3. VI, 14, 1. 38, 5. 40, 5. 46, 6. 48, 4. 61, 2. VII, 1, 2. 21, 8. 26, 2. X, 38, 4. dhäyase J, 31, 13. 72, 9. 94, 12. 130, 2. 141, 6. III, 38, 3. 50, 3. präyase IX, 66, 23. V, 66, 1. cakshase I, 7, 3. 48, 8. 50, 2. 112, 8. V, 15, 4. 70, 2. bhöjase I, 55, 3, VIII, 54, 3. çävase I, 57, 1. 81, 1, 8. 130, 6. III, 37, 1. VIII, 24, 11. nämase VIII, 25, 7. Prävase!, 31, 7. 57, 3. 73, 5. 95, 11. 103, 4. 113, 6. 121, 14. 134, 3. rädhase 1, 17, 7. 81, 8. 139, 6. III, 41, 6. 51, 12. IV, 20, 2. 24, 1. 29, 3. VI, 38, 5. VIII, 24, 12. sâhase 1, 16, 6. II, 51, 4. IV, 20, 6. VI. 38, 5. jiväâse(Wv) l, 25, 21. 36, 14. 37, 15. 44, 6. 72, 7. 79, 9. 89, 2. 91, 7. 117, 24. 119, 1. 146, 5. 155, 4. 172, 3. II, 28, 7. 39, 6. III. 36, 10. 53, 18. VI, 69, 5. VIll, 6, 33. 18, 18, 22. 48. 4. 52, 9.56, 12. IX, 82, 4. 86, 38. X, 14, 14. 18, 6. 25, 4. 25, 6. 35, 12. 57, 4. 185, 3. 186, 3. dohäse (Vduh) 1, 141, 2. VI, 66, 1, 5. VI, 45, 7. bhiyäse(Nbhi, timere) V, 29, 4. caräse I, 92, 9. griyä- se l, 87, 6. pushyäse(Npush) V, 50, 1. rinjäse(varj) VIII, 4, 17. ricäse(Varc) VII, 61, 6. VI, 39, 5. tujäse(Vtuj) lV, 23, 7. çobhäse(Vcubh) 1, 84, 10.

Aptissime huc referemus bactric. linguae themata in anh terminata, quae cum neutris sanscr. in as finitis täm accurate congruunt, ut Bactrorum avanh idem sit et forma et vi ac potestate atque vedi- cum illud ävas, cf. Spiegeli gr. bactr. p. 86, 148. Infinitivi huiusmodi sunt: avanhe yt. 5. 63 moshu

²) Zend-Avestae partes cum Justio, quem in litteris bactr. transcribendis secutus sum, yt. vasht, vd. vendidad.

ila indico, ut y. sit yaçna,