9

IMENIAOY XEIOY EAETEILZYV T4 1L2ZOMEW I. 1. Stobæi florileg. LXXXXVIII, 29. p. 530 sq. 11.2VIAO v.*) Ode v* rrOòαν εμένεακι νπμν εσμςμρπά⁴ν ist, ν ⅞ϑε̈ τ ναςατον ‿‿oο e⁷εεν eν oi, sre Suluν ενε,, roι⁶ε α νςον craνO εμ ꝙνντφ oναασ desειενου 5 œréονοιι ιινρρσεεν,εωνντιι π⁴ςςρςστ ⁷1όο ετστ&ναστι GrdOdν Jre veo Or1,Ss1& 0ꝓετα³. Sunror ꝗ œ Tlo drSOs Sr OAvror J,nje, 0 †ον ⁵— Svιμον eν deντα voui. Obrε ⁴α˙ο Gierid'&er ςεένεν oτe Sανε, 10 08, 5 †1 örv v. Ebpr. eyet auιαou. vyjsriOt, Ois αντν μα—»ο, O50& 10‿σσeν e JOG*Oο ε&◻ ςν ‧⁄ω εμά mℛĩ⁵ιιον νοσ Sy'roνς. dAAd dο τπν ναν ειιτον ετο οαιιι apoii ruν dνό̈νꝙ τλιι ⁷ααςρενιενοs. *) Sie A. Trine. Desunt quinque versus priores A. GAISFORD. Ad fragm. 1. V. 1. Primus versus, qui in Stobæi florilegio desideratur, apud Vr- sinum in Lyricis p. 167 et in appendice Anth. Plannd. p. 511 Steph. p. 16 Wechel. Dosch. Anth. Græc. Vol. III p. 5340. Iacobs. Anth. Pal. Vol. II p. 736 nescio ex quo fonte additus est, eumque, quum nihil in se habeat quod a colore Simonideo aut reliquo- rum distichorum seutentia ac tenore alienum sit, retinendum ae ne uncis quidem circum-

cludendum esse duximus. V. 2. NXioo-“ dr*ο, i. e. Ownoos. Huc respicit Plutarchus de vita et poesi Homeri II, 2. Oanν robre IIdxdoOg 1ud 2o XIoy re eld Tuvraoy perd dai, Niννενςς Ʒ XIov. Similiter hymnus a Thueydide III, 104 Homero adscriptus in Apollinem Del. 172 sq. ruε⁶ο drο, olwet od XG&α πœππααοεσσςσ,—— roð xdαα uεε⁶ιασννεν dLο⁷rsuovde dοι⁶³αs. Etiam Theocritus 7, 47 laudat Xtoy dον⁶³ονν. V. 3. Versus Homericus quo foliorum cito pereuntium levitati opponitur humani generis imbecillitas exstat Iliad. VI, 147 eique explicandi caussa adduntur: quala rd ae cdveοσ Ʒάταἀoςσ σέαν, la d4 9 ün TI106Gℳ qbel, 4aοσσJ" rirꝓrsra don- cdg drdανν peresh dy quer i, dro„⁸. cf. Iliad. XXI, 462. Eodem respexit Mimnermus 2, 1 sqq. 2