7

sclnveigh. fusius exposuerunts:·schleiekmacherus in versi()ne Platonis Ihm-edit v01.1. tOM«I. pi219. HSIMIOPHUS ZU Plat.(1ia1. sel. vojch. p. 466- Lstiusinlibm Platons Le- ben und schriften. p 75.(Miror Astjum, qui quanqiium ipse plurimis ver-bis demonsttet in Platonis Protagom di-- versa tempora conkuncli, ex hoo tamen dialogo colligi passe putat, Protagomm Fli« Fepizmzsinm annozs vixisse. lEjus verba l, l; morgini apposfkä haec sunt:I ,, Naclz klein Als-»m- 91. c. Mark-P-«0«1Fo«wsim 70tcv Jalzre, was sie-m bestimm- ieyz Zmzmisw sicut Plato-» Pyomsn»

12. c. miciesxczwsiclm« scdin oo loca, quem citat Astius, 312

c. nilxil talo kpperilurz nam colloquitiir ibi soc-wies cum Hippocrate de eo, quid sit sophistes. Quum igitur typothctae crrore falsa pogina ci- tata esse videatur, quaeren(111m est, qnenmam potissimum Iocum indicnko voluerit Astiusz sctl frustra quaekas! in omni dialogo nullum esse-kam iczszirrmnizzm de- Protagorao note-te invonics-.« Unions Iocus, qui huc tralii posso vjdctu«-, ab

Astio quoun Vjtkttusp Ost p. 317. c. ubi Protagorns des anno- rum worum ·mu1titudino·loquitur, et gloriatur, se und-sou- jusq110 vorn-n, qui zulsint, patkem esse(posse:« XVI-m MAX- W Its-, JJZH cy« SI- WJ WANT-J-»C« JWP m«««- Zujxwxwø»Ah-I zw« s»«- mösyäzs ask-ou ou wiww w-»Hm- Jus Ihm-» kajp xk Js. so(1 qua1n vsgmn est istud testimonium! quam suspectum in ore bominisH quem vnnum no plurima do se jactnntcm re—« pracsentaro studct Plato! quam plane nullum in(lialogo. üctum temipus prae se fett-nnd)

Ue