1N DE X.

II. 208, 209. 212, 213. It anſwers the moſt valuable ende, II. 210, 211, 212.

F.

FaAcrs EXTRAORDINARY-By which the law af Moſas was at. teſted, were of the moſt public nature, and the accounts of them coeval with the law itſelf, II, 372,&c. Thoſe accounts to be depended on as ſafely tranſmitted to us, 75. 80, 81,&c. The ſame thing ſhewn with regard to the facts by which Chriſ⸗ tianity is atteſted, I. 305,&5c. II. 187, 188 374, et ſeg.

Fairh— That which is required in the Goſpel not a bare ſpecu- lative aſſent, I. 5, 160. Not inconſiſtent wich reaſon, nor to be oppoſed to it, 15. 16 5, 166. II. 196. The difference be- tween fairh and fictiqn reſolved by Mr. Hum intg a more lively and forcible feeling, I. 334. marg. neobt.

FALL OF MaN The Moſaic ascount of it vindicated againſt the objections of Lord Bolingbroke, II. 143, 144, Sc.

FarHERs OF TuE CHRISTIAN CuURCH- ContemptuOux repre- ſentation of them by Lord Bolingbroke, I. 378. 3

FosTER Dr. James— An account of his anfwer to Dr. Tindal'. Chriſtianity as old as tbe Creation, I. 123, 124.

FREE-THINKERS— Blamed by Lord Bolingbroke for à factious ſpirit, under pretence of liberty, I. 374, 375.

FRIENDSHIF- The pretence that it is not required in the Goſpel confidered, I. 88, 89.

FuruRE State of Rewards and Punispments=-Repreſented by Lord Henbert as an eſſential article of natural religion, I. 3. Deiſta diviged about it, 6. 2, 3. 8. Lord Sbafteſbury inſinuates, that the belief of it may be of bad influence in morals, ib. 50,&c. 67. 70, 71. Cbubb's variations with regard to a future ſtate, i6. 198, 199, Ic. This doctrine believed from the earlieſt an- tiquity, II. 2, 3. A part of the primitive religion communi- cated to the firſt anceſtors of the human race, 2. 13. 63. The great uſefulneſs of that doctrine acknowleged by Mr. Hume and Lord Bolingbroke, ib. 406, 407. Jaſtly argued, from the preſent unequal diſtributions of Divine Providence, I. 280, 281. II. 23. To affure us of this, one important end and uſe of divine revelation, II. 60. 61. It is plainly implied in the law of Moſes, though not expreſly mentioned there, i⁵. 156— 158. At the. time of our Saviour's coming, it was not only denied or doubt- ed of by many among the philoſophers, but had little hold of vulgar minds, ib. And therefore a clear and expreſs revelation of it was then neceſſary, 5. 159. The Chriſtian doctrine of, future retributions vindicated againſt Lord Bolingérokes objec- tions, ib. 230, et ſe. ¹

Gpoit