8) 11(36

libelli 1. 19.§. I. ce furud. Gail. E. 1. 0. 127. hodie fi credimus Blum, in proc. Cam.:. 46. u. 10. ex ſententia gravante, non petitione ill. D. de Lud. in jur. Cam..yz. colligenda, in calu

dubio juramento appellantis Standum coneept. C. G. O.:.3

§. 8.& quamvis plures ſummæ ex uno fundmento commu- niv. g. Famil. Exciſe. comuni dividuado judicio, mananrtes, ad quantum determinatum conſtituendum, com binari que- ant T. I1. de juràd. ibiq. Brunn. Mev. p. 8. dec. 106. intereſſe quoque principaliter v. g. in aclione Emt. Vend. petitum, ſummam appellabilem conſtituere poſſit Text. ad Rec.

Imp. Nov. Diſp. 1I. 15. 31. Inſuper Uſuræ liquidæ(nam ima-

ginariz& in prima inſtantia non potitæ, minime proſunt. III. D. de Ludolph. in Jar. Gam. p. 171.) in Camera(ſecus ut

in judicio Aulico, ſi fides habenda Uffenb. de jud. Aul. Cap.

10. ſub/ 2. V. Aber cui contradicit D. de Ludolph.. c. p. 171.)

de Ppraxi ſemper ſortem ad eſficiendam ſummam Ordin. & Privilegio 60. floren. in Rec. defiuitam Mynt. C. 1. 0.

3. G 83. Item teſte Laut. in Coll. Th. pract. tit. de appellat. recip. vel non, ſi Privilegio de non Appellando inſerta re- periantur verba HaupteKlagoder Haupt⸗Sach/ eandem augeant, ſocus tamen erit, ſi Haupt Stuhl/ Haupt⸗Guth/ Haupt⸗ Guͤlt/ Haupt⸗ Summ)/ expreſſa reperiantur. Alia diſcuſſione haut indigna quæſtio eſt, an limitatio in Rec. Imp. nov. ratione ſumma appellabilis, caſu quo gravatus

ſe in ſubſtantia bonorum non ultra 1⁰00, Flor. ſi Sum- 1 B 2 mæ