1 N D E k.
preſented by Mr. Hume as dangerous friends, or diſguiſed ene- mies, to Chriſtianity, who endeavour to Prove it by reaſon, I. C⁴ε⁵rians Uajufly charged by Lord Bolinsbroie with mur- muring through this life againſt the juſtice of God; and there- fore unworthy to taſte of his goodneſs in a future ſtate, II. 21. And with affuming that happineſs conſiſteth principally in the advantages of fortune, ib. Note i. Diviſions among them no argument againſt the truth or certainty of the Chriſtian religion, I. 5, 7. 219. II. 346. The corruptions of profeſſed Chriſtians no juſt objection againſt rrue original Chriſtianity, I. 254. Cuuss Mr. Thomas--Publiſhed ſeveral tracts, in which, under pretence of a great regard for pure uncorrupted Chriſtianity, he endeavoured to betray it, I. 193. His poſthumous Works mani- feſtly intended againſt revealed religion, ib. 194. His high pre- tences and felf-fufficiency, ib. 195. Denies a particular Pro- vidence, 1⁵. 196. Somerimes ſeems to aſſert a future ſtate, at other times repreſepts it as altogether uncertain, and that no. proof can be given of it. ib. 197, 108,&c. He abſolutely re- ſects the Jeviſe revelation, i5. 202. But ſpeaks very favourably of Mahometaniſm, ib. 204. Profeſſes to believe Chriſt's divine miſſion as probable, ib. 205. Vet endeavours to ſubvert the evi- dence by which it is proved, ib. 207. He repreſents the Scriptures as an unſafe guide, and of a pernicious tendency; yet blames the Church ok Rome for locking them up from the laity, and that this tends to involve the people in the moſt groſs ignorance, ſuperſtition, and ſlavery, i½. 208, 209. His attempt to expoſe our Saviour's precepts in his ſermon on the monnt, 15. 210, 211. He grofly miſrepreſents the Goſpel-doctrine of atonement, ib. 214. 215, Sc. Pretends that the Scriptures were corrupted in the times of popery, ik. 220, 221. That the apoſtles changed the original ſcheme of Chriſtianity as laid down by our Saviour ib. 231. 232. And that they had worldly wealth and power in, view, ib. 233, Gc. He abuſes St. Paul, ib. 216,&c. 235, 236. Repreſents all religions as indifferent, ib. 237. Sets up Deiſm as an infallible guide, i⁵. 239, 240. Runs a parallel between the progreſs of Chriſtianity and that of Methodiſm, ib. 230, 231. CLARENDON Earl of— His Brief Viez and Surwvey of the pernicious ⁵ Errors in Hobbes“ Lewiatban, I. 36. CLARKE Dr Samuel— His Refiegtions on Toland's Amyntor, I. 45- His anfwer to Mr Collins on the immateriality and immortality of the human ſoul, I. 85. II. 19. Invectives againſt him by Lord Bolingbroke, I. 380, Cénſured by his Lordſhip for ſuppoſing that juſtice and goodneſs are the ſame in God as in our ideas of them, 15. 390, 30 1. And for repreſenting God as having a tender concern for the happineſs of man, ib. 388. Aund for ſuppoſing that there are inequalities and diſorders in the preſent ſtate of things, and arguing from thence for a fature ſtate of retribu- 4 F f 4 tionse


